Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1982-01-27

Cited by 436 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Norris, J. The sole issue presented by appellants’ first proposition of law is whether, in reversing a trial court on the basis that the court should have granted a motion for a directed verdict, a court of appeals engages in weighing evidence and therefore is bound by the provision of Section 3(B)(3), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, which prohibits reversal on the weight of the evidence of judgments resulting from a trial…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.