Rudbart v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided 1992-04-27

Cited by 155 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GAULKIN, P.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned), concurring in part and dissenting in part. Part III of the per curiam opinion concludes that, although the project notes are contracts of adhesion, “plaintiffs are bound by the provision for notice by publication because of the unique policy considerations attendant on securities offerings.” Ante at 361, 605 A.2d at 68…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.