Roszman v. Sammett

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1971-04-28

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Steen, J. The record presents this question for determination : Do the facts and circumstances as disclosed by the *96 record show a wanton act on the part of the defendant which precludes the defendant from urging the negligence of plaintiff’s decedent as a defense to this action? The basis for plaintiff’s claim, as set forth in her pe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.