Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 2008-08-20

Cited by 312 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Richard Rosenau claims that a debt-collection letter he received from Unifund Corporation and/or Unifund CCR Partners (“Unifund”) was deceptive under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The District Court granted Unifund’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Rosenau appeals, a…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.