Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1999-01-22

Cited by 140 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

NIGRO, Justice, dissenting. I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that a decision of the Pennsylvania Probation and Parole Board (hereinafter “Parole Board”) to deny an application for parole upon expiration of an inmate’s minimum sentence is not subject to judicial review. Section 21 of the Act of August 6, 1941, (Parole Act), P.L. 861, as amended, 61 P.S. § 331.21, provides: <blockquo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.