Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne Express

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2001-09-12

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CANBY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Robert Rodriguez brought this action against Defendant Airborne Express (“Airborne”) for discrimination based on disability in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). After removing the case to federal court on the ground of diversity of citizenship, Airborne moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the mo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.