Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant

U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit · Decided 1993-11-18

Cited by 108 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*1580 MAYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I believe the district court abused its discretion when it granted Cedarapids’ motion to exclude reference to the earlier case of Mendenhall v. Astec Industries, Inc., 13 USPQ2d 1913, 1988 WL 188449 (E.D.Tenn.1988), aff 'd, <span class="citation multiple-matc…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.