Riviello v. Waldron

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1979-06-07

Cited by 474 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Jones, J. (concurring). I concur in result in this case but cannot accept what appears to me to be the overbreadth of the majority opinion, addressing as it does matters which are not necessary for the resolution of this appeal. Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli and Wachtler concur with Judge Fuchsberg; Judge Jones concurs in result in a separate memorandum; Judge Jasen dissents and votes to affirm for…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.