Rise v. Oregon

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1995-07-18

Cited by 129 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority fails to find a Fourth Amendment violation arising from the nonconsensual DNA genetic pattern analysis of persons convicted for murder or various sexual offenses (including such non-violent crimes as public indecency or pimping, or attempts at any of the included sexual offenses). Ostensibly applying a traditional balancing test that weighs the severity of…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.