Ridgeview Properties v. Starbuck

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1982-01-14

Cited by 132 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Hicks, J. This case is here on a direct appeal which we retained. It arises from a real estate transaction in Spokane County. Appellants Starbuck claim violations by respondent of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and breach of fiduciary duties. The trial court found to the contrary. We affirm. Respondent Ridgeview Properties (Ridgeview) is a licensed re…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.