Reynolds v. Goll

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-03-04

Cited by 130 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. Appellant, the biological father of Diana Goll, challenges the trial court’s award of custody of his daughter to Paul and Virginia Reynolds. For the reasons that follow'', we find that the trial court was warranted in its grant of custody of the minor to the Reynoldses. Consequently, we affirm the court of appeals. At the outset, we note that this case is limited to a child custody…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.