BARKETT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I dissent to the extent that the majority declines to address Jones’ tort claims of intentional interference with an advantageous business relationship and disclosure of confidential information. In my judgment, Jones sufficiently asserted these claims, which do not challenge the validity of…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.