Renfro v. Black

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-06-13

Cited by 135 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. Plaintiffs-appellants’ first and third propositions of law are interrelated and will be considered together. I Plaintiffs argue that the trial court should have permitted the jury to consider the “timeliness” of a so-called “Dear Doctor” letter dated “November, 1983” that Smith Laboratories sent to Dr. Dwight, and that the trial court should have instructed the jury < c…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.