Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1998-12-24

Cited by 108 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Guy, J. In this case we are asked to decide whether one of several submerged, rooted tree stumps near the middle of a water channel in a dam reservoir is an “artificial” and “latent” condition under the exception to the recreational use statute, and whether the public duty doctrine bars a claim for injuries allegedly caused by a county’s failure to warn boaters of submerged tree stumps. We hold that the injury-causing condition…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.