Raritan Development Corp. v. Silva

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1997-10-28

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Smith, J. Respondents, the Commissioners of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York (BSA), argue that this Court should defer to the agency’s interpretation of section 12-10 of New York City’s Zoning Resolution. However, when an interpretation is contrary to the plain meaning of the statutory language, we have typically d…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.