Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 2006-06-26

Cited by 254 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Kennedy, concurring in the judgment. The Court decides the constitutionality of the limitations Vermont places on campaign expenditures and contributions. I agree that both limitations violate the First Amendment. As the plurality notes, our cases hold that expenditure limitations “place substantial and direct restrictions on the abil…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.