Rand v. Rand

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1985-08-07

Cited by 219 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Locher, J. Appellant presents four propositions of law. For the reasons set forth herein, we find these propositions lack merit and therefore affirm the court below. Appellant’s first proposition of law states that “Article I, § 7 of the Ohio Constitution prohibits a domestic relations court from ordering a support-paying spouse to make charitable contributions to a place of worship for the purpose of indoctrin…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.