Chief Justice MULLARKEY dissenting. The majority reverses the trial court’s ruling that the plaintiff in this case, R.A.S. Builders, Inc. (R.A.S.), could recover some of its costs for improvements to property owned by the defendant, Euclid Commonwealth Associates (Euclid), based on a claim of unjust enrichment. For the reasons stated in my dissent in DCB Construction Co., Inc. v. Central City Develop…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.