Proulx v. Wells

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 2007-08-31

Cited by 218 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PER CURIAM. In this case, the court of appeals held that limitations barred the plaintiffs suit because, as a matter of law, he was not diligent in serving the defendant with process. 186 S.W.3d 630, 631 . We hold that the summar…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.