MICHEL, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I cannot join the majority opinion which upholds a jury verdict of non-infringement which no reasonable jury could have reached. Our precedent is well settled that when a chemical invention is claimed using “consisting essentially of’ language, the mere presence of an additional, unclaimed substance— here, iron sulfide — does not avoid infringement unless it has a “material”…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.