Pool v. Superior Court

Decided 1984-01-04

Cited by 269 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Steven Pool (defendant) and Kevin Phillips (who received permission to intervene) were charged with "a violation of A.R.S. § 13-1802 " (theft). At trial, defendant objected to the conduct of the prosecutor and moved for a mistrial; the motion was granted. The prosecution then obtained a second indictment, specifying other charges, which was dismissed without prejudice. The prosecution now seeks to try defendant on a new indictment. Defendant moved for…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.