Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2010-05-21

Cited by 1,880 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judges O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, GOULD, TALLMAN, CALLAHAN and BEA join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: Judge Bea’s dissent persuasively explains why the majority opinion conflicts *671 with Ninth Circuit precedent, and I would join it if I could. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 565 F.3d 1106, 1117-…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.