Pickens v. State

Decided 1993-03-25

Cited by 162 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CHAPEL, Judge, specially concurring: I specially concur in this case because I find that the police obtained appellant’s confession in violation of his right to counsel, but, because of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, I find the error harmless. To explain the constitutional violation at issue requires a brief review of the facts. When Officer Dale White arrested appellant, he read a…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.