Phillips v. Cricket Lighters

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2003-12-03

Cited by 197 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION Chief Justice CAPPY. This is an appeal by allowance. We are asked to resolve whether the Superior Court properly reversed, in part, the *649 trial court’s order dismissing all of the claims against the manufacturers and distributors of a cigarette lighter which was allegedly the cause of a fatal fire. For the reasons that follow,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.