Peters v. Ohio State Lottery Commission

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1992-03-25

Cited by 149 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J. Appellants advance several arguments in support of their position that they are entitled to the unclaimed prize money from the drawings for which they selected the winning numbers. Additionally, appellants assert that the Court of Claims erred when it allowed into evidence certain computer records over their hearsay objection. In its cross-appeal, the lottery commission renews its argument that the Court o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.