OPINION OF THE COURT Bracken, J. The principal question in this case is whether an error in a jury charge, which the defendant claims constituted a violation of his constitutional right to be tried only upon *247 theories charged in the indictment, is reviewable as a matter of law in the absence of a timely objection. We hold that it is not, and aff…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.