Opinion by JUDGE BERNARD T1 As a general rule, section 18-1-408@8), C.R.S.2012 (subsection 408(8)), requires concurrent sentences when a defendant is con-vieted of multiple crimes based on identical evidence. The issue in this case is whether a sentencing statute for sex offenses, section 18-1.3-1004(5)(a), C.R.S.2012 (subsection 1004(5)(a)), creates an exception to the general rule. If so, it would require conse…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.