People v. Smith

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2001-01-11

Cited by 426 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MOSK, J. I concur in the opinion of the court. I do so because I find the following propositions implicit in the court’s analysis. First, what is called “waiver” (maj. opn., ante, at p. 852) is, strictly speaking, forfeiture by a party in failing to preserve a claim of error for review on appeal. (See generally People v. <em…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.