People v. Sanders

Decided 1985-05-20

Cited by 250 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Weinstein, J. (dissenting). Notwithstanding the majority’s attempt to characterize witness Astacio’s testimony as “resemblance” rather than “identification” testimony, I am of the view that defendant was deprived of a fair trial by the court’s permitting Astacio to give a detailed description of the perpetrator after having suppressed that witness’ pretrial and in-court identifications as totally unreliable (see, People v Ada…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.