People v. Parker

Decided 2012-02-14

Cited by 246 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in removing him from the courtroom prior to the prosecutor’s summation. “A defendant’s right to be present at a criminal trial is encompassed within the confrontation clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions” (People v Parker, <a href="/opinion/5685948/people-v-parker/#139" aria-description="Citation for…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.