People v. Manzy W.

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1997-02-20

Cited by 121 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

I dissent. The declaration requirement in juvenile "wobbler" cases (Welf. Inst. Code, § 702 ) was enacted in order to facilitate determination of the limits on any present or future commitment to physical confinement. Where the record explicitly reflects the court's commitment of a juvenile to the maximum felony term of confinement on a wobbler offense, the limits are clearly determinable and there is no risk of confusion in subsequent adjudica…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.