People v. Lawton

Supreme Court of Illinois · Decided 2004-10-07

Cited by 152 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

JUSTICE FITZGERALD, dissenting: I strongly agree with the majority that Lawton’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacks merit. I strongly disagree with the majority that section 2 — 1401 provides a new procedural avenue for a defendant committed under the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act (SDPA) to assert an abandoned ineffective-assistance claim. <p "b315-10" pgmap…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.