People v. Jones

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1997-03-10

Cited by 118 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I concur in the reasoning of the plurality opinion except for its analysis of two issues. First, I conclude, contrary to the plurality, that the prosecutor violated defendant’s constitutional right to remain silent by presenting evidence of defendant’s invocation of that right. As Justice Werdegar notes in her concurring and dissenting o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.