People v. Hall

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1964-11-25

Cited by 109 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCOMB, J. I dissent. I do not believe that the follow ing statement in the majority opinion is an accurate statement of the law: “To justify a criminal conviction, the trier of *113 fact must be reasonably persuaded to a near certainty. The trier must therefore have reasonably rejected all that undermines confidence.” (Italics added.) It is my un…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.