TURSI, Judge. Defendant, Charles Fordyce, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for return of property. We affirm. Defendant argues that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of rebutting the prima facie case of ownership of the items seized which he claims to have established through his testimony. We perceive no error. Defendant was arrested while driving a stolen car…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.