People v. Duarte

Supreme Court of California · Decided 2000-12-04

Cited by 204 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BAXTER, J., Concurring and Dissenting. Minor portions of William Morris’s interview in police custody, even as redacted for use at trial, may have been improperly admitted against defendant under the penal-interest exception to California’s hearsay rule (Evid. Code, § 1230), because they were not “specifically disserving” to the nontestifying Morris…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.