People v. Crooks

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 2016-06-23

Cited by 265 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. Defendant contends that he was entitled to a hearing pursuant to People v Darden ( 34 NY2d 177 [1974]) to determine whether the information provided by a confidential informant (Cl) was sufficient to establish probable…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.