People v. Collins

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1968-03-11

Cited by 200 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCOMB, J. I dissent. I would affirm the judgment in its entirety. Appendix If “Pr” represents the probability that a certain distinctive combination of characteristics, hereinafter designated “C,” will occur jointly in a random couple, then the probability that C will not occur in a random couple is (1 — Pr). Applying the product rule (see fn. 8, ante), the probability tha…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.