People v. Cable

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1984-10-30

Cited by 395 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Meyer, J. (dissenting in part). Respectfully I dissent from so much of the majority opinion as holds that denial of the request by defendants Godbee and Cable that they be *285 granted a continuance to call a surrebuttal witness was not error. I would, therefore, grant a new trial in their case. 1 At the conclusion of Dr. Hyland’s direct…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.