KENNARD, J. I concur in the judgment. I disagree, however, with the majority’s reasoning and conclusions on two issues. I. The trial court ruled that because prosecution witness Dana Crappa was “unable ... to testify . . . because of then existing . . . mental illness or *811 infirmity” (Evid. Code, § 240, subd. (a)(3)), she was “u…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.