People ex rel. Elder v. Sours

Decided 1903-04-15

Cited by 117 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Justice Campbell, dissenting. The decision of the majority is, in my judgment, radically wrong. The importance of the amendment, and the public interest in it, but chiefly my firm con-victim that constitutional inhibitions have been ignored and a precedent established which overturns, without saying so, our previous decisions, lead me to express at length my views upon the legal questions involved. <p…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.