People ex rel. A.M.K.

Decided 2003-02-27

Cited by 966 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Judge VOGT specially concurring. I agree that the case must be remanded because the trial court's order does not reflect that it considered the presumption in favor of the biological father when it allocated parental responsibilities for A.M.K. I write separately, however, to emphasize that this presumption is rebuttable. In In re Custody of C.C.R.S., <span class="citation" data-"516565…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.