Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. Graulty

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1989-09-27

Cited by 195 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: The law firm of Paul, Johnson, Alston Hunt (“PJAH”) timely appeals an order of the district court awarding it roughly $855,-000 less than the amount of fees it had requested as compensation for creating a “common fund.” PJAH contends that the district court misconstrued the common fund doctrine so that the fee awarded is unreasonable. We agree, and therefore we vacate the district court’s order…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.