Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann

Decided 2011-12-07

Cited by 140 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. This case arises from an employment relationship between appellant Park Nicol-let Clinic and respondent Dr. Arlyn Ham-ann. The district court dismissed Ham-ann’s complaint against Park Nicollet, holding that the statute of limitations barred his claims. The court of appeals reversed. Because we conclude that Ham-ann’s claims accrued in April 2005, when Park Nicollet committed the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.