Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1945-04-09

Cited by 134 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Stone, concurring. Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter and I concur for the following reasons only. Petitioners did not raise objections in their application for rehearing to the Commission to the inclusion of their *651 producing and gathering facilities in the rate base. By § 1…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.