Pang v. Minch

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-08-29

Cited by 433 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I I concur in paragraph one of the syllabus as it is a correct statement of the law. I do not agree, however, with the majority’s discussion supporting the proposition. Former Loe. R. 21 makes a distinction, internally, between “medical witnesses” and “expert witnesses.” Part 1(C) of the rule makes ref…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.