Padilla v. LaFrance

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1995-10-05

Cited by 511 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ENOCH, Justice, joined by GAMMAGE, Justice, dissenting. Today the Court holds that a settlement agreement is an enforceable Rule 11 agreement despite the fact that it never complied with all requirements of the rule before the existence and terms of the agreement became disputed. But for this Court’s prior opinion in Kennedy v. Hyde, <a hr…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.