Justice ENOCH, joined by Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HANKINSON, and Justice O’NEILL, dissenting. Because the Osterbergs made arguments in their motion for rehearing that merit discussion, I withdraw my July 29, 1999 dissenting opinion and substitute the following. This is a statutory construction case. Ironically, the Court’s chosen construction of section 253.131(a) of the Election Code…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.