Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 1988-05-31

Cited by 406 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Concern for Oneida’s numerous unsecured creditors compels me to dissent from the court’s disposition. Those creditors, as well as Oneida, stand to lose by virtue of that disposition. If Oneida had been able to foresee this court’s novel application of equitable and judicial estoppel, it would have been able to protect itself against the loss the court today imposes upon i…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.