One Hour Cleaners v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Decided 1995-12-21

Cited by 228 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Judge TAUBMAN dissenting. Because I believe that the contents of the Federal Register concerning the effectiveness of thermography were both relevant and material, I would hold that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) committed reversible error by not taking judicial notice of this document. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. As the majority…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.